Chapter Twenty-nine

The Brahman and the Ramayana

 

Home          Next Chapter        Previous Chapter      Glossary

As dawn’s first light sends reflections along the river every morning, the Brahman makes his way to its waters to perform his daily ablutions and recitations, including the Gayatri Mantra. This mantra is an invocation to Savitri, the intelligence that enlivens the sun. The petitioner requests that this powerful intelligence guide him throughout the day.

          Let us meditate on the most excellent
          Light of Savitri
          May he guide our intellect.

Throughout Bharata’s long history, all Brahmans have recited this short verse from the Rg Veda at the three principal times of the day: sunrise, noon, sunset. Seemingly, the tradition is rarely practiced in today’s world, for the Brahmans are occupied reciting stock indexes on Wall Street and in Bombay stock exchange. However, in the awsome stretches of rural south India, the tradition remains viable.

Every morning and every evening, I have the pleasure of watching Shiva RamaKrishna make his way to the river with a big brass pot on his head, then hearing him recite his prayers. Afterwards, he returns with the pot, filled with holy water from the Kauveri River, back to his hut. Watching this trip back through the centuries gives me a very soothing and secure feeling, I feel grateful that some things never change.

The essential purpose of the Vedas is to insure the well-being of all aspects of the creation. While in a high intuitive state, the ancient rshis became aware of the subtle cosmic vibrations that had become denser, then intermingled into patterns, which we perceive with our sense organs as the various forms and objects of the material world.

Thus the Vedic mantras (verses) were intuited in a timeless state to be used in the realm of time. The actual chanting of the mantras is an important aspect of the protective and creative power of Vedas. The chanting assures the alignment of the physical world with the original creative vibrations, whereby humankind can live in harmony with his subtle origins. Therefore, a group of people, that is, the ones of subtle mind, began to chant the mantras and to perform the Vedic rites for the welfare of humanity.

Since the purpose of chanting the mantras is to create a harmony between the original sounds of creation and the invoker of the mantra, the correct innovation of words is necessary for the mantras to retain and manifest their innate power. This is the reason that the sages warn that a modification in the chanting of a Vedic mantra will produce no effect.

This same phenomenon exists even in our everyday world. When I, with my American accent, asked for the bus to Basavanagudi at the Bangalore bus station, all I got was "No English,” from the official sitting at the information table. I think I am pronouncing an Indian word, but he thinks I am speaking English. It is only when a kind person, standing to the side, speaks up and repeats the word, Basavanagudi—just exactly like I thought I said it—that the face of the official lights up in recognition. Then he enthusiastically directs me to the correct bus.

The Gayatri is considered the most important of the Vedic mantras, as it is a prayer, an invocation and a creative power, all in one. This Mantra specifically requests: "May my actions be in harmony with the highest intelligence,” that is, the highest good. Its repetition the first thing in the morning tunes the mental attitude for the day to the station that brings forth one’s best qualities. So our actions, which are often merely mechanical impulses from past experiences, begin to have some moments of conscious content.

A deity is associated with each mantra. The deity provides a symbol with which the mind collects positive ideas and inspirations. The Gayatri Mantra is addressed to Savitri. Savitri’s name is from the Sanskrit root Su = to excite or stimulate; therefore, his name can be translated as: The stimulator of everything. He is not the physical sun, but a power because of which there is a sun. The Gayatri Mantra is concerned with humanity and the universe, plus the Unknown that sustains them.

Shiva RamaKrishna and his flower-covered hut

One afternoon, I go over for another long discussion with Shiva RamaKrishna. He is such an endless fountain of knowledge that I only go to his cottage every other day, or I would pass the whole day listening to and questioning him. He has translated the Ramayana by Tulasi Das into Tamil and has had it published through a trust to sell at the low price of 25 Rps. [$.80] for nine hundred pages. He has also translated it into English, but has been waiting for someone to check the English and give an opinion if it is worth publishing.

He relates to me that when he first saw me he was so happy; he felt that Rama himself surely had sent me here. This was news to me, as I had feared that the resident sadhus might consider a "foreign lady” an intrusion.

"Oh, no,” he exclaimed, then explained that every letter that Gandhi wrote in English was first checked by Mirabhen, his English secretary, before it was released. I told him that I was helping with the editing of a spiritual magazine, so there was no reason I could not help him also.

"I don’t want to put any burden on your head.”

"No, I want to read the Ramayana anyway. Also, I have a knack for editing, so it will be no burden. That is, if there is no pressure of a deadline.”

"Oh, no. It’s been sitting in Madras for three years now, waiting for someone like you to come along.”

Siva RamaKrishna had been a professor of English literature in a small university. His father had died when he was a teenager; therefore, for many years he was the sole support of his mother. I never asked, but assumed, this was the reason that he never married. A son who is responsible for the support of a widowed mother has a mark against him on the eligibility list for marriage. When she died and the necessary rituals were completed, Siva RamaKrishna resigned his job, gave up his home, and started living the life of a sadhu. He had lived in various ashrams until he discovered Ram Sadhu about ten years ago.

Since then, he has spent most of his time here in a small hut beside the master’s. In addition, his interest in the Ramayana has taken him to Ayodhya, the birthplace of Rama. While in that region, he became acquainted with the Mahant there. Unlike the Shankara Mathas whose heads are picked for scholarly and spiritual achievement, the position of the Mahant in the North is simply purchased; we will assume by one who has spiritual aspirations. Evidently the current Mahant was not particularly schooled in the scriptures because he was quite pleased to find a scholarly assistant like Siva RamaKrishna. He wanted the Brahman to remain in the North all year, but the Brahman protested that a south Indian cannot endure the winters of the North.

One day he tells me, "You know when I came here some ten years back, it was Ram Sadhu who came to me one day and placed a Tulasi Ramayana in my hand with the words.‘This is to be your life work from this day,’ he told me. Since that day I have been totally immersed and completely satisfied with its study. So you see how insightful these great ones like Ram Sadhu are.”

The Ramayana is the history of an Incarnation—God born as man without any veil: his birth as the Prince Rama, his marriage, the loss of his kingdom, his separation from his wife, and the subsequent battle with the demons of the world to reunite with her. Filled with wisdom on the morals and ethics faced in the drama of human life, it is also interspersed with expositions of the highest eternal truth: We are Divine. In addition to Rama’s and Sita’s history, it is filled with the traditional stories of the Indian sages and kings. More than any other literary work, it represents the heartbeat of Bharatha. All castes and creeds, particularly in the North memorize this Tulasi version, rendered in poetry. Last year when the Ramayana was playing on national television, trains did not move until the one hour episode was over. Yes, train stations in the large towns have television screens dangling from the platform ceilings, but not in the waiting rooms.

One afternoon, Shiva RamaKrishna covers a portion of the Ramayana that includes material that Ram Sadhu acclaims is wonderful. He often interrupts the Brahman’s commentary with comments, praising some thought, or even singing the verses, but he is more exuberant than usual today. His expressed joy is infectious. It makes one wonder how the world must look through his eyes.

Often I muse during my travels what it would be like to have a Hindu mindset. If I were to tell Ram Sadhu that I was born a sinner, doomed to hell, he would topple over in disbelief. I try to imagine what it would have been like to be raised with the conditioning, "I am a child of light.” The Vedas state that only an inherent illusion keeps me from seeing this Truth. Due to this Ignorance, we become involved in the world and accumulate mala, or dirt, that covers our divinity, just as soot collected on a kerosene lamp glass obscures the light of the flame. So we have a simple task in life: remove the dirt, or simply realize the illusion, or impermanence, of the dirt. Even on a cloudy day, the sun is shining.

After class I ask Shiva Ramakrishna to show me in my English translation the particular passage that Ram Sadhu was revering today. I just love this edition of the Ramayana. It’s a beautiful rendition translated by a British missionary, Dr. Atkins. Obviously inspired while accomplishing the arduous task, he actually used a poetic format in the meter of the original Tulasi Dasa version in Prakrit language. Just reading the words in English inspires an open, expanded consciousness. It’s obvious that the work was a labor of love for Dr. Atkins.

He tells me the passage he covered today is from a conversation of Laksmana, Rama’s brother, with Guha, the ferryman who will take Laksmana across the river to meet his brother. Please note there is no copyright for this translation, in spite of the Western capitalist influence, most spiritual works are still not copyrighted in India. Thank god, these precious veins of the uniqueness of the Bharathis, "the children of light,” still exist. Everything has not yet been swept away by "western civilization.”But for how long?

The passage that Ram Sadhu was so excited about is so short that I want to reproduce Laksmana’s words for you here:

        No man can give sorrow or joy to another,
        It’s always the fruit of one’s own actions, brother,
        Uniting, dividing, foul pleasers or fair,
        Evil, good, or indiff’rence—‘tis delusions snare;
        Of life and of death the world’s course is the reason,
        Of all gain and loss, of each fruit in its season;

        One’s city and fam’ly, land, riches and home,
        Even life and death too, in the world’s course must come,
        But listen and note and take heed in your soul—
        All these things are unreal, bring us not to our goal.
        Just as in their dreaming, kings may become beggars,
        And beggars may well become gods,
        But waking find no gain or loss, so to us
         Is this delusive life with its odds.

        So consider this well, and with anger have done;
        For these troubles put uselessly blame upon none,
        Here we are all asleep and we see many dreams,
        But because of illusion, real ev’ry one seems;
        In this night-like world those devoted ones waken
        Who, seeking the real, have all false things forsaken.

        Know this—Only then the soul wakens to morn,
        When it turns from all sensual pleasures with scorn
        When the soul wakens falsehood and error must flee;
         Then to Rama’s blest feet one devoted can be;
        In thought, word and deed to his feet when devoted;
        The chief good of life is then ours, be it noted;
        For Rama is Brahma[n], of all good the essence,
        Eternal, unseen, filling all with his presence,
        Unequaled, above all division and change;
        Scriptures show Him to be far beyond our mind’s range.

        For the sake of the faithful, mankind, Brahmans, cows
        And gods also, he’s come in his kindness;
        He’s taken man’s form and assumed human ways;
        Hearing this, men are freed from their blindness.
        Understand this friend; leave behind dreams and deceit;
        Be devoted to Sita’s and Raghubir’s [Rama’s] feet.

I sit out on the garden bench to read it aloud, so I can appreciate the meter of the poetry. In a short time, the Sadhu appears, so I mention that I have just read the words of Laksmana.

"Those words are so esteemed that they have been named the Laksmana Gita [song].”

"Oh! He expresses so beautifully that Rama is the presence in all. So Rama is what you have been calling the Life.”

“The same. Rama is that very force, but he took an Incarnation, so that man may know about the Life. But don’t think you’ll figure it out; it’s beyond the intellect.”

Eventually, I get Shiva RamaKrishna to talk about himself more. He was a young boy during the India’s independence movement.

“You mentioned Gandhi. Did you know him personally?”

“No, I never met him. You see our leader here in the south was Rajagopalachari. Father wanted to join the satyagraha movement, but Rajaji told him true satyagraha was living the principles in one’s own home. We spun cotton for our own clothes, planted our vegetables, and lived as if we were in an ashram right in our own home.

“Rajaji was a great man; he does not get the credit he deserves. He did have his own ashram in Tiruchengode here in Tamil Nadu.”

“I know there was quite an outcry from the Tamilians when he was not included in the film, Gandhi,” I mention.

“Well, I know all these Indians with their difficult names are hard to keep up with, so it was probably a justifiable omission. Did you see the film?”

“Yes, it was quite good. Except for one point, which unfortunately occurred right at the beginning of the movie. When Gandhi was assassinated, he uttered two words, ‘He Ram.’ To a Hindu it is considered most auspicious to invoke the name of the Lord at the moment of death. However, when they translated it into English for the movie, they had him say, ‘Oh, God’ which sounded more like ‘Oh, no,’ so it distorted the meaning entirely.”

“That is most unfortunate. ‘Oh, God’ would not convey the true meaning at all,” he agreed.

I reply, “To me that one utterance, more than anything, proves his sainthood. Otherwise, it is rather hard for me to believe that he was a saint. To one who knows anything about his personal life, he is very controversial. How could the proponent of non-violence have been so dogmatic to his own children? Then there was his habit of living in luxurious homes of Indian millionaires, who clearly made their fortunes by exploition the poor. And his sexual hang-ups were just too blatant.”

“You must mean Gandhi’s experiments with sleeping with his niece? Not even the Indians approved. Patel told him he had to stop it, but Gandhi was a very stubborn man. In the end, Patel had to tell the niece to stop the experiment because it was harming Gandhi’s image. She obeyed Patel.”

“It seems to me that he even projected his sexual hang-ups on his own sons. After pumping out four children himself, he expected his sons to remain celibate. It’s inhuman that a father won’t let your own children make their own decisions on such essential matters as marriage and parenting. In fact, it is against the four ashramas of Hinduism,” I observe.

“You are right. He did not get the idea from the rshis. But neither is the idea of asceticism, accompanied with celibacy, foreign to our tradition. Certainly, he must have been influenced by guilt about his early sexual activity.”

“He was justified in resenting that his father forced him to marry at age thirteen. But his insatiable appetite at that age can hardly be blamed on his father. Anyway, why take it out on his sons?”

On second thought, I continue, “Of course, I know that he was not the only Indian revolutionary who was a tyrant over his family. Jinnah, the leader of the Muslim contingent of India, would not let his daughter marry a non-Muslim, although her mother was a Parsi. [Jinnah married back in the days when religion did not count so much.] Nehru’s father, Motilal Nehru annulled his daughter’s marriage to a Muslim.”

Since the Brahman remains silent, I interrupt the silence, “This authoritarian side of Gandhi is not brought out in his profiles. I’m surprised that Patel had the nerve to defy him.”

“Oh, yes. Patel was a powerful man with his own ideas; that’s why Gandhi favored Nehru. He thought Nehru would be more obedient to his ideas. But Gandhi never chose Nehru as his successor.”

“So Gandhi had not designated Nehru to be the leader of Congress, therefore, the first Prime Minister of India?”

“No, definitely not. Did you know that Gandhi asked Nehru to allow Jinnah to be the first Prime Minister? He thought that was a solution to the Muslim problem. But Nehru was ambitious; he flatly refused.”

“I had forgotten that detail, but I think it was mentioned in the movie. That one act could have saved India so much grief. And since Jinnah had tuberculosis, he would have been dead and out of the picture in less than a year. I can’t believe India’s fate.

“You know Jinnah has always been a puzzle to me. I’ve seen photos of him around 1947 and anyone could have discerned that he was a very sick man; the symptoms of TB must have been well known in those days. The British authorities were stepping aside to allow him to incite a revolution and commandeer a part of India. I have to wonder if they actually knew he had a short time left on the planet. If so, what were their real motives?”

“There are many things that are just now coming out. Just the week before he was assassinated, Gandhi had dictated a letter to his secretary, telling the Congress National League to disband. It had been formed to gain independence for India, and that had been accomplished. He emphasized that it was not a political party. Different parties should be formed according to different ideologies to stimulate debate and reform on the central government level. But he died before that letter was actually signed and delivered. And the letter was suppressed for all these years.”

“I’m afraid it’s obvious who benefited from that. Nehru was able to run a one man show as head of the one viable political party—Congress. One biographer said he didn’t trust any authority to anyone. . . But I’m really surprised the letter had not been destroyed,” I remark.

“It was kept in some file, somewhere, and it was recently dug out. A lot of things about the Nehru family are coming out now also.”

“Do you think there’s anything to that persistent rumor that Nehru was half-brother to the prince of Kashmir, and that was the real reason he would not let the Kashmiris vote as they had been promised? He was protecting his own family—and we know family ties in India can be very strong.”

The Brahman simply shrugs, then changes the subject. “Ram Sadhu’s family lived in the part of Punjab that went to Pakistan.”

“Oh, dear. There are so many horrible stories of the losses of property—and even lives—of the Hindus there.”

“Oh, yes. It was a serious situation. Even Ram Sadhu went back to his former home to help his family move to the Indian section and to get situated in a new home here.”

“Oh, it was great that he was able to do that. Of course, he is a man unto himself. It’s not like he has to obey any rules of some monastic order or religion.”

Further, RamaKrishna informs me that the Sadhu’s wife has come here to Kumbakonam several times in the past ten years since Ram Sadhu has lived in the ashram. She likes to spend a month or so here in the holy atmosphere. She was seven years younger than he, so she must be ninety now.

Often we discuss some aspect of English literature. Although he had studied only a few American authors, RamaKrishna did read and appreciate Emerson.

“Actually Emerson was one of my favorite authors. Since I taught English literature, I was always happy to find insightful writing in English. I especially liked his poem Brahma, although he missed on the translation of the title. It should have been Brahman, the neuter form of brh, the Impersonal; not Brahma, the masculine form, which is the creator deity.”

He turns and rummages through some papers, and pulls out a typewritten page. Then he reads the words,

        If the red slayer think he slays,
        Or if the slain think he is slain,
        They know not well the subtle ways
        I keep, and pass, and turn again.

        Far or forgot to me is near;
        Shadow and sunlight are the same;
        The vanished gods to me appear;
        And one to me are shame and fame.

        They reckon ill who leave me out;
        When me they fly, I am the wings;
        I am the doubter and the doubt,
        And I the hymn The Brahman sings.

        The strong gods pine for my abode,
        And pine in vain the sacred Seven;
        But thou, meek lover of the good!
        Find me, and turn thy back on heaven.

“That last line shows he truly understood that heaven is not a permanent abode. Pretty good for a Christian of his era,” I observe.

“Yes, it is wonderful how some intellectuals of both America and Britain seriously studied the Hindu thought.”

“Emerson must have been a contemporary of Thomas MacCauley, who wrote the most scathing criticism of Indian literature. So I’m glad both sides were represented.”

Siva RamaKrishna has visited the site of the controversial temple site at the birthplace of Rama. The Moslems destroyed the original Hindu temple, as they had done across India for centuries. “Loot, then destroy, the temples of the idolaters” was their war cry. All the Indian news sources state that a Moslem mosque has been built on the site over the ruins of the original temple. Although it is hallowed ground to the Hindus, the Moslems will not release it back to them. But Siva Ramakrishna tells me another version.

“I have seen it with my own eyes, Nancy. I assure you there is no mosque there, and never has been. There is a monument to a war hero, but not a place of worship.”

“That’s strange. Why perpetuate this debate then?” I question.

“I tell you, there is something else going on. They have even moved in Mosl ems to live in that area to keep the dissension alive. And then there was that incident with the massacre of all those sadhus.

“Massacre of sadhus? I don’t know anything about that,” I exclaim.

“Yes. I understand the BBC carried the story, but it was totally suppressed in the Indian news. Hundreds of sadhus were advancing in mass to reclaim the Hindu sacred site from the Muslims. The Indian army troops arrived while they were still en route. The troops fired into the mob, killing hundreds of them. Then they loaded the bodies into lorries and carried them away. No one ever heard another word about it.”

“That is really strange,” I lament.

“But the details will have to come out. There is actual video footage of some of the massacre. It will be released when it is appropriate,” he adds.

“So this is more than a religious feud. I cannot comprehend what the Government has to gain by keeping this heated battle going,” I am quite perplexed.

“These things will all come out sooner or later.”

The roof of the verandah of the Brahman’s small hut is covered with an incredible vine that bears the loveliest lavender flowers, shaped like small trumpets with a scalloped edge. I am not the only one who enjoys them. Every time I come here I am able to see at least one extraordinary butterfly. All the common butterflies continually flutter through the garden here . The large black, white and fluorescent red one is always gliding about. They are so common here that I have come accustomed to its radiant presence, so I am no longer overwhelmed when I see one. A smaller white variety, veined with black is also plentiful. It appears rather plain until it folds its wings up and shows the orange and yellow underneath. Then one day a huge moth with mirrored wings shows up. I wonder if they were the inspiration for the mirror work on vests and bags made by the women in Rajasthan and Orissa. A couple of the school boys ran to get me to show it to me. I do not know how they knew I was a butterfly lover.

The next time I go to his hut to talk with him, I tell Shiva RamaKrishna, “I have really been thinking about Gandhi’s situation. When I was only about fifteen I read a book that really impressed me, The Bridge of San Luis Rey by Thornton Wilder. I have often said that it was the only true wisdom I heard or read until I was at least twenty-five. Do you know it?”

“No, I don’t.”

“I know you were a professor of English literature, not American. Anyway, the premise of the book was that the moment of death is predetermined—and logical.”

I go on to explain, “One bright day in the jungles of South America, a bridge collapsed, plummeting some one dozen people to their deaths. The author painstakingly traced the life of each one of these people to demonstrate that, at that precise moment, it was a perfect time for their life to end. But it’s been so long since I read it that I can’t even recount one single example.

“So if you use that same hypothesis for Gandhi’s life, or simply karma, as you Hindus would put it, it does seem that Gandhi had done all he could. History was just moving in another direction; he was no longer needed. Maybe he even knew that his appeal to form parties would be ignored. Certainly, his economic and political policies were being ignored.”

Siva RamaKrishna agrees, “Yes, he died exactly a year after our Independence, so by that time it was evident that Nehru was going his own way. Even at the moment of Independence, Nehru defied Hindu custom. The British always handed over the reins to the new government at midnight. Everyone warned Nehru: This is not an auspicious time for the birth of a nation. But Nehru just would not listen. In many ways, he was more British than the historians comprehend. He himself was a Brahman and should have understood these things.”

“But he really knew little about the essence of Hinduism.”

“No, he didn’t know. He was a secular man. Gandhi saw all these things. Even Gandhi himself admitted that he was a failure.”

“I didn’t know that. Gandhi himself said he was a failure?”

“Oh, yes. At Independence, India erupted into a terrible civil war. He had no illusions about the failure of the Indians to rise to his ideals.”

“I guess we all assumed that had it not been for him there would have been more violence.”

“That is certainly true in limited instances because of the pressure of his fasting to end the killing. No one can fathom the number of Indians dead. There is no official account, but, I tell you, it was very disheartening—for all of us, and especially for Gandhi.”

“The real enemy walked out unscathed, and the Indians killed each other. We Westerners called it a great success. So really Gandhi’s non-violence just saved the British. I hope that is not why we have embraced it so.”

While I am spending my usual hour in the morning sun reading, Ram Sadhu approaches me. “Now I want you to review that section of the Ramayana that we are going to read in class today. Tulasi Dasa recounts the best place for Rama to dwell. No one has ever written such a beautiful account of the residence suitable for Rama. Call it imagination or speculation, it doesn’t matter. This section uplifts the aspiration of the sadhak [seeker]. That’s all that matters.”

I took my book to Siva RamaKrishna so he could point out the section to me. Just as we start discussing the pointers to indicate the best place for Rama to dwell, Ram Sadhu sticks his head in the door, “Is my daughter here?”

The Brahman jumps up to greet Ram Sadhu with a respectful salutation. The Sadhu places in his hands a couple of bananas and a nimbu for New Years.

Then he tells the Brahman: “I want her to understand the condition of that perfect temple where Rama dwells.” He then turns his head to me and gives me a long meaningful look, “It is within.”

“Yes, Swamiji, I suspected that.”

As the Sadhu ducks out of the low door, Siva RamaKrishna sets the fruit aside, commenting, “He’s always doing this kind of small thoughtful deed to all of us. He is always concerned for everyone else’s welfare.”

“Yes, he is a veritable ocean of sweetness. I know ‘kindness’ is the usual word, but whenever I think of him, ‘sweet’ is always the word that comes to my mind first.”

“Yes, you are right; he is an ocean of sweetness.”

“I feel so grateful to be here. My punya [merit from good deeds] must be considerable for me to be able to spend this special time on earth instead of waiting for heaven!”